Finally! – The general press recognizes that jobs come from venture investments in technology
It has been a very long time in coming, but this morning’s New York Times finally contained a column (by Thomas Friedman, author of The World is Flat and many other interesting books) that says what I have been trying to get people to understand for ages: if we want to create jobs and build an economic engine for the long term, the place to invest is not old, failed industrial giants but rather new, entrepreneurial technology companies.
Granted, I am professional venture capital investor, so I readily admit that allocating a portion of the economic stimulus program to venture investing could potentially help my venture fund. However, I am also a US citizen who pays a high tax bill every year. I want my tax money to be used well, not squandered.
I also know what venture investing does well – and it is particularly good at creating the type of new industry that creates large numbers of high-quality jobs. What are the most striking economic engines of the last 15-20 years? Certainly not GM or Westinghouse. More like Microsoft, Apple, HP, Cisco, Google, etc.
The world needs new technologies right now, especially technologies that can wean us off of fossil fuels and stop the process of destroying our environment. The entire industry of CleanTech is bubbling along with great ideas that need investment dollars to determine which ideas will succeed and which will not.
Every day I see business plans describing exciting new plans in healthcare, ideas that can directly target diseases and more efficiently improve quality of life.
Communications technologies have revolutionized how people interact with one another and share ideas recently. How many people carried cell phones just 20 years ago, or even were aware that email existed? Today, access to the entire world is in my pocket via voice, text, email, and social networking. I am never out of touch from my young daughters the way I was out of touch from my parents every day as I grew up. Many of us have close friends that we have never met face-to-face, and probably never will. This communications revolution is still accelerating, with the assistance of venture investment and brilliant entrepreneurs.
Lets take a small portion of that stimulus and create the technologies that will drive the US economy for the next 25 years!
I have reprinted Mr. Friedman’s column in today’s NYT below. Please take time to read it and think about it.
Start Up the Risk-Takers
Reading the news that General Motors and Chrysler are now lining up for another $20 billion or so in government aid — on top of the billions they’ve already received or requested — leaves me with the sick feeling that we are subsidizing the losers and for only one reason: because they claim that their funerals would cost more than keeping them on life support. Sorry, friends, but this is not the American way. Bailing out the losers is not how we got rich as a country, and it is not how we’ll get out of this crisis.
G.M. has become a giant wealth- destruction machine — possibly the biggest in history — and it is time that it and Chrysler were put into bankruptcy so they can truly start over under new management with new labor agreements and new visions. When it comes to helping companies, precious public money should focus on start-ups, not bailouts.
You want to spend $20 billion of taxpayer money creating jobs? Fine. Call up the top 20 venture capital firms in America, which are short of cash today because their partners — university endowments and pension funds — are tapped out, and make them this offer: The U.S. Treasury will give you each up to $1 billion to fund the best venture capital ideas that have come your way. If they go bust, we all lose. If any of them turns out to be the next Microsoft or Intel, taxpayers will give you 20 percent of the investors’ upside and keep 80 percent for themselves.
If we are going to be spending billions of taxpayer dollars, it can’t only be on office-decorating bankers, over-leveraged home speculators and auto executives who year after year spent more energy resisting changes and lobbying Washington than leading change and beating Toyota.
I’ve been traveling all across the country on a book tour, and every evening I return to my hotel with my pockets full of business cards from inventors in clean energy. Our country is still bursting with innovators looking for capital. So, let’s make sure all the losers clamoring for help don’t drown out the potential winners who could lift us out of this. Some of our best companies, such as Intel, were started in recessions, when necessity makes innovators even more inventive and risk-takers even more daring.
Yes, we have to shore up the banking system, which underpins everything; and finding a fair way to prevent hardworking people, who played by the rules, from losing their homes to foreclosure is both right and essential for stability.
But beyond that, let’s think, talk and plan in more aspirational ways. We’re down, but we’re not out. As we invest taxpayer money, let’s do it with an eye to starting a new generation of biotech, info-tech, nanotech and clean-tech companies, with real innovators, real 21st-century jobs and potentially real profits for taxpayers. Our motto should be, “Start-ups, not bailouts: nurture the next Google, don’t nurse the old G.M.’s.”
To be fair, the stimulus package that the Obama team and the Democrats in Congress recently passed — with virtually no Republican help — goes some way toward doing just that. Hat’s off for that. Now let’s do more.
The renewable-energy business — wind, solar and solar thermal — was almost dead in this country. Most new projects stopped last fall because they depended for their financing on selling their renewable energy tax credits to Wall Street firms. As those Wall Street firms went bust or suffered steep losses, they had no need for tax credits because they had no profits to offset. The stimulus package created a mechanism for renewable energy innovators to bypass Wall Street and monetize their tax credits directly through the U.S. Treasury, for any project that starts between now and the end of 2010.
The wind and solar industries in America “were dead in the fourth quarter,” said John Woolard, chief executive of BrightSource Energy, which builds and operates cutting-edge solar-thermal plants in the Mojave Desert. Almost five gigawatts of new solar-thermal projects — the equivalent of five big nuclear plants — at various stages of permitting were being held up because of a lack of financing.
“All of these projects will now go ahead,” said Woolard. “You are talking about thousands of jobs … We really got something right in this legislation.”
These jobs will be in engineering, constructing and operating huge solar systems and wind farms and manufacturing new photovoltaics. Together they will drive innovation in all these areas — and move wind and solar technology down the cost-volume learning curve so they can compete against fossil fuels and become export industries at the “ChinIndia price,” that is the price at which they can scale in China and India.
That is how taxpayer money should be used to stimulate: limited financing, for a limited time, targeted on an industry bristling with new technology start-ups that, with a little push from Uncle Sam, won’t just survive this crisis but help us thrive when it is over. We need, and the world needs, an America that is thriving not just surviving.
A version of this article appeared in print on February 22, 2009, on page WK10 of the New York edition.